Walston v. Greene
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentRodman, J.
I dissent because I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached by the majority that a child who has passed his sixth but has not reached his seventh birthday is so lacking in mental capacity and judgment that under no circumstances can he be held responsible for his conduct. I think the conclusion reached is contrary to common experience. *698The fallacy of the conclusion is, I think, illustrated in our public schools. By constitutional mandate we provide a public school system for children when they reach the age of six. Enrollment in the first grades in North Carolina approximates 110,000.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Caudle v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Alexander v. . StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. SprottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934