Legal Opinion

Raino v. Supermarkets General Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 23, 1992No. 9750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.

The plaintiffs1 appeal from a judgment for the defendant, rendered after a jury trial, in an action for personal injuries and loss of consortium. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly refused to admit into evidence the handwritten notes of the defendant’s night manager that were made soon after he learned of William Raino’s injury in the defendant’s store. The plaintiffs claim that these notes, although constituting hearsay, should have been admitted into evidence under one of several exceptions to the hearsay rule. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. PalozieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Kelly S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Heritage Village Master Ass'n v. Heritage Village Water Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Labenski v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Baughman v. CollinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. State v. HubbardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API