Legal Opinion

Labenski v. Goldberg

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 15, 1994No. 12221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the commissioner of motor vehicles suspending her license. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that the defendant’s reliance on hearsay evidence constituted reliable, probative and substantial evidence necessary to support the defendant’s findings of fact and legal conclusions, (2) concluded that the plaintiff’s substantial rights under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act; General Statutes § 4-166 et seq.; were not prejudiced by the defendant’s decision to impose a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paquette v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Medes v. Geico Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Labenski v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Ellam v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Johnston v. SalinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API