Nosek v. Stryker
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This case involves a dispute between two neighbors owning adjacent land on the shore of Powers Lake. Each riparian owner claimed that the other’s pier encroached upon his waterfront rights. The trial court found the Noseks’ pier interfered with the Strykers’ riparian rights and was therefore a private nuisance to the Strykers. The trial court ordered the Noseks’ pier moved a considerable distance away from its present location. The Noseks appeal, and we affirm.
There is no set rule in Wisconsin for establishing the extension of boundaries into a lake between contiguous shoreline properties.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Cohn v. Wausau Boom Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Delap v. Institute of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Northern Pine Land Co. v. BigelowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Abdella v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perpignani v. VonasekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Lopardo v. Fleming CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Bath v. CourtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Godfrey Co. v. LopardoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Daisy Farm LTD. Partnership v. MorrolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.