Legal Opinion

Bath v. Courts

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1984No. 3-483a112PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Ralph and Margaret Bath and John and Naney Courts are neighbors owning adjacent land on the shore of Nyona Lake. The Courts maintained a pier which extended out from their own property. Because the Courts wanted to build a platform at the end of their pier without interfering with the public pier, they angled their pier away from the public pier to cross the Baths' shorefront property. Shortly after the Courts angled their pier, the Baths built a pier parallel to the property boundary they shared with the Courts. This pier came within two feet of the Courts's pier and interfered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. ROSS v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Stoner v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ross v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Don H. Gunderson and Bobbie J. Gunderson, Co-Trustees of the Don H. Gunderson Living Trust v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Alliance for the Great LakesIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Watson v. ThibodeauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Zapffe v. SrbenyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Center Townhouse Corp. v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API