Legal Opinion

Godfrey Co. v. Lopardo

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 28, 1991No. 90-2073PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal by riparian owners Richard J. and Catherine A. Lopardo disputing the placement of a neighboring pier built by the Godfrey Company. The issues are numerous and protracted. It is enough to state at the outset our holding that Godfrey does not own the property from which the pier extends; it is an easement holder. We further decide that Godfrey nonetheless has a riparian right to have a pier pursuant to new sec. 30.131, Stats. We affirm a portion of the case but mainly reverse and remand to the circuit court with directions to further remand this action to the Department of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. Haines v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Interest of H.N.T.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sea View Estates Beach Club, Inc. v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. Borsellino v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Lopardo v. Fleming CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Ellingsworth v. SwiggumCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard, Needles, Tammen & BergendoffCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API