Legal Opinion

Daisy Farm LTD. Partnership v. Morrolf

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2008No. 43A04-0707-CV-390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Daisy Farm Limited Partnership (“Daisy Farm”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Michael Morrolf and Jill Morrolf (the “Morrolfs”). We reverse and remand with instructions.

Daisy Farm raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in determining riparian boundaries.

II. Whether the trial court erred in determining that a disputed tract did not pass to Daisy Farm by virtue of adverse possession. 1

Daisy Farm and the Morrolfs own adjoining lots of land in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Zapffe v. SrbenyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Naderman v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Center Townhouse Corp. v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daisy Farm Ltd. Partnership v. MorrolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Constantinos P. Angelopoulos v. Theodore P. Angelopoulos, Neptunia Inc., Transmar Corp., Didiac Establishment, Beta Steel Corp., and Top Gun Investment Corp. IIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Bailey v. Indiana Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Gunther Kranz and Carol Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Property Owners Association, Inc., Christopher Bartoszek, and Indiana Dept. of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API