Daisy Farm LTD. Partnership v. Morrolf
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Daisy Farm Limited Partnership (“Daisy Farm”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Michael Morrolf and Jill Morrolf (the “Morrolfs”). We reverse and remand with instructions.
Daisy Farm raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in determining riparian boundaries.
II. Whether the trial court erred in determining that a disputed tract did not pass to Daisy Farm by virtue of adverse possession. 1
Daisy Farm and the Morrolfs own adjoining lots of land in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Zapffe v. SrbenyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Naderman v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Center Townhouse Corp. v. City of MishawakaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daisy Farm Ltd. Partnership v. MorrolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Constantinos P. Angelopoulos v. Theodore P. Angelopoulos, Neptunia Inc., Transmar Corp., Didiac Establishment, Beta Steel Corp., and Top Gun Investment Corp. IIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bailey v. Indiana Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gunther Kranz and Carol Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Property Owners Association, Inc., Christopher Bartoszek, and Indiana Dept. of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.