Legal Opinion
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Caswell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 1, 1992No. C2-92-300PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
An action was commenced by respondents Thomas Caswell, Hamilton Ross, Thomas Krausert and Charles Hommeyer (The Caswell Group) against respondents The Caswell Ross Agency, Inc. (Caswell Ross II), Regional Financial Agencies, Inc. (RFA), C. Bruce Solomonson, and the accounting firm of Schweitzer, Rubin, Gott-lieb & Karon. The defendants in the underlying action tendered the lawsuit to appellant Employers Reinsurance Corporation (ERC), which denied coverage. ERC then commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking a judicial determination that it was not obligated to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Knutson Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Wyatt v. WyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Massamont Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. National Real Estate Clearinghouse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997