Legal Opinion

Bishop v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 4, 2006No. 03-446CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FILED UNDER SEAL.1

BRUGGINK, Judge.

OPINION

This is an action brought under the Federal Employees Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5541-5550a (2000) (“FEPA”). Plaintiffs claim that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) owes them compensation for overtime work they performed before and after their assigned shifts. Approximately 582 plaintiffs are involved in this and other similar cases against the BOP. Plaintiffs filed this case in 2003, but other cases were filed as early as 2000. Plaintiffs serve in a variety of positions throughout BOP facilities scattered across the country. During the pendency of discovery in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Bobo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API