Legal Opinion

Dahn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1997No. 96-4183PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal encompasses three of four cases consolidated in district court. The first, 93-C-953W, is a quiet title action under 28 U.S.C. § 2410, in which plaintiff Karen Dahn initially objected to enforcement of a tax penalty against her property, but later sought to substitute a claim…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Adams v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Farmer v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Robbins v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API