Legal Opinion
Bardoff v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1993No. 88-CM-17, 88-CM-32PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
These consolidated appeals arise from appellants’ cdnvictions following a jury trial for violations of D.C.Code § 9 — 112(b)(4) (1989) (disruptive conduct on United States Capitol grounds) and D.C.Code § 9-112(b)(7) (1989) (demonstrating within a United States Capitol building). The appellants, Michael Bardoff and Michael Kreis, raise identical issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in quashing subpoenas for two United States Senators and an official of the United States House of Representatives based on a privilege under the Speech or Debate Clause of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Comford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wright v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.