Legal Opinion
Judy Scheidemantle v. Slippery Rock University State System of Higher Education
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 2006No. 05-3850PublishedCited by 309 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Judy Scheidemantle alleges that Slippery Rock University discriminated against her by refusing twice to promote her for an advertised locksmith position and hiring unqualified male employees instead. Slippery Rock countered, in a motion for summary judgment, that it did not promote Scheidemantle because she was unqualified for the position. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania agreed with Slippery Rock in granting its motion, determining that Scheidemantle failed to establish a prima facie case of gender…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by309 opinions
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Alanda Forrest v. Kevin ParryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- D.E. v. Central Dauphin School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
304 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.