Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Lawrence

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSeawell, J.

The defendant was indicted for violating the "Photography Act."

The important provisions of chapter 155, Public Laws 1935, "An act to regulate and control the practice of photography." N.C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sections 7007 (1)-(29).

Section 7007 (1) contains definitions.

Section 7007 (2) provides for the establishment of a State Board of Photographic Examiners to be appointed by the Governor. Subsequent sections provide for its organization, hearings, rules and public record of its proceedings.

Section 7007 (10), "The board shall provide for the examination of applicants who desire to practice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Roach v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . LockeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API