Duke University v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for plaintiff because plaintiff’s insurance policy excluded coverage for liability resulting from the wrongful death action. Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless Ins. Co., 315 N.C. 688, 690, 340 S.E.2d 374, 377 (1986). It is undisputed in this case that plaintiff’s policy required defendant to provide a defense in lawsuits…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Sturgill v. Ashe Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Duncanville Diagnostic Center, Inc. v. Atlantic Lloyd's Insurance Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.