Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Sinkler
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 9, 1984No. 67744PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a traverse to an answer of a garnishee. The First National Bank of Atlanta instituted a garnishment, directing a summons on May 4, 1983, to Thomson McKinnon Securities, which named Brock Sinkler, a former employee of Thomson McKinnon, as the defendant judgment debtor. Plaintiff’s plead ings were verified. The garnishee’s answer was not verified but substantially followed the format set forth in OCGA § 18-4-66 (4). The answer notified plaintiff that nothing was owed the defendant and that he was not due any wages by garnishee.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coursin v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Buice v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Spence v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- City Finance Co. v. WinstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vines v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Stovall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Georgia Mental Health Institute v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Hospital Authority v. State Health Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Lamad Ministries, Inc. v. Dougherty County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.