Spence v. Rowell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Code § 69-101 declares: “No local law seeking repeal of a municipal charter of a city of less than 50,000 inhabitants, or an amendment to any municipal charter of a city of less than 50,000 inhabitants which amendment materially changes the form of government of a municipality or seeks to substitute officers for municipal control other than those in control under the existing charter, shall become effective until such repeal or amendment shall be voted upon by the qualified voters of the municipality to be affected as hereinafter…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Penick v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Boston & Gunby v. CumminsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Maner v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hart v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Buice v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Atlanta Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Medical Center Hospital Authority v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- First National Bank v. SinklerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.