Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 2004-SC-000566-DGPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

This case comes to us on discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion, which held that county jails, not the Commonwealth, are responsible for paying the cost of providing psychotropic medications to inmates incarcerated at those county jails pursuant to KRS § 441.045(3). In so ruling, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Franklin Circuit Court granting a sua sponte motion for summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Commonwealth of Kentucky. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I. FACTS

This case arose over a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gateway Construction Company v. WallbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Ledford v. FaulknerKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brown v. HoblitzellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Shawnee Telecom Resources, Inc. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Richardson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Maynes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Abel v. AustinKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Miller v. Tema Isenmann, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API