Seeger v. Lanham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE KELLER
Both parties appeal separate holdings of the Court of Appeals. This action originated as a paternity action pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 406.021 in the Nelson District Court. The issues before the Court have been consolidated into one action. We now address each issue in turn and affirm in part and reverse in part the holding of the Court of Appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
Harry Seeger ("Seeger") and Sharon Lanham ("Lanham"), while each married to other partners, engaged in a relationship leading to the birth of a child on June 13, 2007. On December…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EnglishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. EldridgeKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Regional Jail Authority v. TackettKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Revenue Cabinet v. O'DANIELKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bryant v. Louisville Metro Hous. Auth.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Travelers Indem. Co. v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- May v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bonfiglioli USA, Inc. v. Midwest Engineered Components, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Clark County- Winchester Heritage Commission v. Thomas NortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.