Legal Opinion

In Re Rubiola

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2011No. 09-0309PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

In this original mandamus proceeding, Relators seek to compel arbitration under an arbitration agreement they did not sign. The real parties in interest, who are signatories to the arbitration agreement, object to arbitration and contend that Relators cannot compel arbitration because Rela-tors are not parties to the arbitration agreement. The trial court apparently agreed because it denied Relators’ motion to compel arbitration. The underlying arbitration agreement, however, designated certain non-signatories as parties to the agreement.

We must decide whether the parties who actually agree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Henry v. Cash Biz, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Jody James Farms, Jv v. the Altman Group, Inc. and Laurie DiazTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Pinto Technology Ventures, L.P. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2017

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API