Legal Opinion

Metz v. Wyeth, LLC

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 28, 2012No. Case No. 8:10-CV-2658-T-27AEPPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant Actavis Elizabeth LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 91) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 109). Upon consideration, the Motion to Dismiss will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED.

Introduction

Plaintiffs, Barbara Metz and Donald Metz, filed this action against Wyeth LLC (“Wyeth”), Schwarz Pharma, Inc. (“Schwarz”) and Actavis Elizabeth, LLC d/b/a Purepac Pharmaceuticals (“Actavis”) for injuries arising from the use of metoclopramide,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Trisvan v. HeymanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Frazier v. Mylan Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  5. Diana & Mark Sherman v. Pliva, Inc, Teva PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API