Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. 10-85-05303; CA A38947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance and being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We reverse.

On June 15, 1985, at 7:11 a.m., police officer Galick observed three individuals conversing between two closely parked vehicles in a downtown Eugene parking lot. Defendant was the only occupant of one car. As Galick drove onto the lot, defendant reached behind the seat, appeared to cover something and then drove off. After observing that the car did not have a front license plate and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API