Legal Opinion

State v. Haney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2004No. 00CR0978MI, A116614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his misdemeanor conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained by the state through a warrantless search of his car. After a single-car accident that left defendant—who was the driver of the car—hospitalized, an officer entered defendant’s car without a warrant to search for ownership and insurance information. The state maintains that the entry was a legitimate administrative search authorized by ORS 810.460, which requires officers at accident scenes to submit accident reports.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. KoroteevCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API