Legal Opinion
Albert v. United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1960No. 14308PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This is an original action in mandamus and prohibition to compel the District Judge to certify his disqualification to hear a certain pending action and to prohibit him from conducting further proceedings therein because of his alleged personal bias and prejudice.
An affidavit alleging personal bias and prejudice on the part of the Judge in favor of and against certain parties and attorneys in said pending action in the District Court was filed by petitioner under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 144.
The District Judge, upon consideration of the affidavit of personal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States Ex Rel. McLennan v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States Ex Rel. Girard Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. KrupanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- In Re City of Detroit, Detroit Water and Sewerage DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. PartinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Samuel G. Albert v. United States District Court For The Western District Of Michigan, Northern DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.