Legal Opinion

Medders v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The mere fact that a man is present at a still then being operated, without some evidence to connect him with the operation, either directly or indirectly, is not sufficient evidence upon which to base a verdict of conviction; but the insufficiency of the evidence to convict cannot be raised in this court for the first time. The record fails to show either a request and refusal of the affirmative charge or a motion for a new trial or other action testing the sufficiency of the evidence. Bean v. State, 18 Ala. App. 281, 91 So. 499.

The attempt to manufacture prohibited liquor is an indictable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bean v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Corkran v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Etheridge v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API