Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 10, 1984No. 83 C 4878PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
On May 1, 1984 Magistrate Olga Jurco issued her thoughtful report and recommendations (the “Report,” copy attached) in this Social Security disability action. During the intervening three-week period:
1. Both plaintiff Florinor McKenzie (“McKenzie”) and defendant Margaret Heckler (the “Secretary”) have permitted the ten days provided under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) to elapse, without either having filed any written objections to Magistrate Jurco’s proposed findings and recommendations. Government counsel has apprised this Court’s law clerk no…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William Edward Goodermote v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Felton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Kopulos v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Bohn v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.