Legal Opinion
Borglin v. Palmer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 31, 1934No. 3285PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The present appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals: of the United States Patent Office in a patent interference proceeding, which decision affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences in awarding priorty to the party Palmer. The interference is between the application of the party Borglin, Serial No. 269,600, filed April 12, 1928, and the patent of the party Palmer,. No. 1787281, issued December 30, 1930, on his application, Serial. No. 289079, filed June 28, 1928. The patent to Palmer was inadvertently issued.
*1110The interference has four counts, the subject matter thereof…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foster v. AntisdelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Braunstein v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Luellen v. ClaussenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
- Prindle v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kendall v. SearlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Katzman v. GeorgievDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936