Legal Opinion

Katzman v. Georgiev

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The application is for an order compelling the respondents, witnesses in an interference proceeding pending in the Patent Office, to answer certain questions put to them.

The Commissioner of Patents declared an interference between two applications for patents, that of Georgiev and that of Katzman, in order to determine to whom a patent on the alleged invention should be issued. One Rice was the record owner of the Katzman application. In the resulting proceeding each party proceeded to take testimony. Georgiev put questions to three witnesses to develop whether some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Cable Co. v. John A. Roebling's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. Borglin v. PalmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. De Forest v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  4. Lattig v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API