Prindle v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference ju’oceeding involving priority of invention of a method of making divided lasts. There were three parties to the interference when declared, — Walter E. Trufant, Jonathan T. Brown, and Edwin J. Prindle.
The issue embraces three counts as follows:
“1. As an improvement in the art of forming lasts or last parts, the method which consists in forming a siirface other than' the foot-shape contour of the last or last part, such surface having a definite geometric relation to a surface having a useful function in the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Borglin v. PalmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934