Legal Opinion

Reonal v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 8, 1993No. 91-2014PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANKIN, Judge:

Bartolomé R. Reonal appeals the September 10, 1991, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which determined that new and material evidence had not *459been submitted to reopen his claim for service connection for residuals of a fracture of the left femur with shortening and coxa vara deformity, and found that appellant did not have the requisite service for pension eligibility. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) filed a motion for summary affirmance. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252(a) (West 1991). We affirm the BVA decision.

I.Factual…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Suttmann v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  5. Justus v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Angel S. Nieves-Rodriguez v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
  2. McLendon v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
  3. Rick K. Kahana v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  4. Jerry G. Dalton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  5. Floyd v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API