Legal Opinion
State v. Patton
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1970No. 487PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendants’ motions for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.. S.A.1953, (Supp.1969)], were denied without hearings.
Rule 93, supra, provides in part that:
“Unless the motion and the files and' records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief,, the courts shall * * * grant a prompt hearing therein, determine the issues and. make findings of fact and conclusions-of law with respect thereto.”
The motions, files, and records do not conclusively show that defendants are not. entitled to a hearing. Accordingly, we reverse.
Defenda…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LobbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. RobbinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. Rito CanalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BaumgardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. KenneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salazar v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. SwimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. PattonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972