Legal Opinion

State v. Baumgardner

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1968No. 167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

Defendant has appealed from an order denying without hearing his pro se motion for post conviction relief under Rule 93, § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of armed robbery in violation of § 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953, and sentenced to serve a term of not less than ten nor more than fifty years in the penitentiary.

Seven points are relied upon for reversal which will be considered and disposed of in the order of their presentation.

Defendant first contends that an issue as to the voluntariness of his plea was raised by his motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. LobbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. HudmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GortonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Patterson v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Latham v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Hernandez v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API