Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1971No. 767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWAN, Judge.

Following his sentencing as an habitual criminal, from which no appeal was taken, petitioner filed a “Motion to Vacate Judgement (sic) and Sentence under Rule #93”. From an order denying this motion without a hearing, the petitioner appeals. We reverse.

Petitioner’s motion is based principally upon his assertion that he was denied the right of an appeal from his conviction because he was refused legal counsel. The motion alleges that the petitioner was an indigent; that counsel had been appointed to represent him at the trial, and did so represent him; that after conviction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GortonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. BarefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Chacon v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Chacon v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API