Guardianship/Conservatorship of B.K.J.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] B.K.J. appeals from a district court order appointing J.W. and Guardian and Protective Services, Inc; (“G.A.P.S”), as her co-guardians. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in appointing J.W. and G.A.P.S. as B.KJ.’s co-guardians.
I
[¶ 2] B.KJ.’s niece, J.W., petitioned for the appointment of a guardian and a conservator for B.K.J. on the grounds B.K.J. suffered mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and dementia and had shown decline in her ability to care for herself and her finances. Particularly, J.W. asserted B.K.J. had over $600,000 in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Bismarck v. Mariner Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Matter of Guardianship of NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Interest of E.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guardianship/Conservatorship of R.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- N.P. v. M.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Guardianship of M.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Interest of D.M.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023