Legal Opinion

State v. Albert

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 26, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

After a jury trial in Superior Court (An-droscoggin County), in which the Defendant, Kevin Lee Albert, Sr., was convicted of Class A gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (1983), 1 he asserts on appeal (a) that the Superior Court erred in applying M.R.Evid. 412 to exclude evidence of the victim’s past sexual behavior, and (b) he further asserts that the court failed to respond sufficiently to the jury’s request to have certain testimony read back.

We find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

The following evidence was produced at trial. On or about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Frederick James One FeatherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Albert NezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. State v. EngstromSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RuffenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. State v. JacquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. State v. HollandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Thompson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. RuffenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API