State v. Johnson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
Defendants Jerald Johnson and Dominic Profenno appeal from their respective convictions of murder and attempted murder, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 201, 152, resulting from a jury trial in Superior Court (Cumberland County). On appeal, they argue that the presiding justice committed error in 1) denying a motion by Profenno to sever the two trials, 2) excluding testimony by the defendants’ roommate regarding a possible inference from silence, 3) admitting into evidence three knives discovered in defendants’ apartment, and 4) excluding a tape recording of a conversation between Johnson’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HarnishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. WeisbrodeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State v. ChesnelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- State v. PendexterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State of Maine v. Jeffrey P. WymanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.