Thompson v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, Justice.
In the case before us, the State appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Bradford, J.) granting Paul W. Thompson a new trial on his petition for post-conviction relief. The State argues that the post-conviction court erred by applying our decision in State v. Jacques, 558 A.2d 706 (Me.1989), retroactively to Thompson’s conviction. We agree and vacate the court’s grant of a new trial. On Thompson’s cross-appeal, we affirm the court’s finding that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel.
Thompson was indicted on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HiderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Carmichael v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007