Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Nez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1981No. 79-2247PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Albert Nez appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with intent to commit rape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153 and § 2031. 1 In urging reversal, appellant contends that the trial court committed error by limiting cross-examination regarding the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. State v. GreenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. Carl S. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Colon-AngueiraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. United States v. StamperDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API