United States v. Albert Nez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Albert Nez appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with intent to commit rape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153 and § 2031. 1 In urging reversal, appellant contends that the trial court committed error by limiting cross-examination regarding the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. GreenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- United States v. Carl S. BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Colon-AngueiraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- United States v. StamperDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.