Legal Opinion

Deseret Sav. Bank v. Francis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1923No. 4002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiiebby, J.

In the year 1920 the commissioners of Ogden City levied special local taxes on certain property in paving district No. 128 east, in Ogden City, to defray the expense of paving a roadway in the district, payable in ten equal annual installments. Thereafter, and under the authority of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 746, coupon warrants, drawn on the treasurer of the city and against the fund created by the special tax levy, were issued to the contractor in payment of the cost and expense of the improvement. A number of these warrants were transferred to the plaintiff, who presented them at maturity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  4. Ex Parte JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. New York Life Ins. v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  2. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. BergIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Banner v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Hazel Park Nonpartisan Taxpayers Ass'n v. Township of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API