Legal Opinion

Bear River Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 23, 1989No. 880249-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

2Per curiam

At this court’s request, this case was argued and submitted under R.Utah Ct. App. 31(a), permitting an “expedited decision without a written opinion.” Cases eligible for “Rule 31 disposition” generally include “uncomplicated factual issues based primarily on documents, summary judgments, dismissals for failure to state a claim, dismissals for lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction, and judgments or orders based on uncomplicated issues of law_” R.Utah Ct.App. 31(b). A case scheduled for Rule 31 disposition is orally argued and ordinarily decided within two days by…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mel Trimble Real Estate v. Monte Vista Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Marriot v. PACIFIC NATIONAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Commercial Union AssuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Village Inn Apartments v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  3. Wagner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Pollard v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. Derma Pen v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API