Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. Berg

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1932No. 5818PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J. —

Prior to the time chapter 134, Sess. Laws 1929, became effective, the City of Pocatello organized Local Special Improvement District No. 28. Whether under chap. 257, Sess. Laws 1927, or the statutes in effect prior thereto, the record does not disclose, and is perhaps not material, inasmuch as the portions of chap. 257, Sess. Laws 1927, and the statutes in effect prior thereto as bearing on the controversy herein, are substantially the same.

Special local assessment improvement district bonds were issued and sold, and later when insufficient funds were realized from the district to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Walton v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Harbold v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Breckenridge v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Marks v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API