Chace v. Dorcy International, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Krupansky, Chief Justice.
This convoluted appeal represents four consolidated appeals from two distinct cases which were consolidated at the trial level. The judgment entry in the two consolidated cases purportedly reflects, viz., (1) the approximately $2,000,000 tort settlement agreement between three of six party defendants and (2) a declaratory judgment resolving the issue that Kansa General Insurance 1 owed a defense and indemnification as well as a money judgment to the manufacturer and its vendors since the insurer, Kansa General, refused to defend in the tort action.
The judgment entry…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. BrandenburgOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Rose v. the National Mutual Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Miller v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Lexington Ins. Co. v. Zurich Ins. (Taiwan) Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.