Legal Opinion

Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brandenburg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1995No. 1993-2099PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 157.] MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. BRANDENBURG ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brandenburg,

1995-Ohio-281.] Civil procedure—Trial court has authority under R.C. 2721.09 to assess attorney fees based on a declaratory judgment issued by the court—Determination to grant or deny request for fees will not be disturbed, absent an abuse of discretion. A trial court has the authority under R.C. 2721.09 to assess attorney fees based on a declaratory judgment issued by the court. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. BrandenburgOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. G. S. T. v. City of Avon LakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Landis v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Woodside Mgt. Co. v. BruexOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Calabrese Law Firm v. ChristieOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Harper v. Dog Town, Inc., 08 No 348 (12-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API