Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Humberto Tzoc-Sierra

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 2004No. 03-10490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the sentence imposed on Juan Humberto Tzoc-Sierra following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The government argues that the district court erred by granting a downward departure based in part on factors forbidden by the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”). Applying the new standard of review mandated by the “PROTECT” Act, 1 18 U.S.C. § 3742, we conclude that the downward departure was justified by the disparity between Tzoc-Sierra’s sentence and that of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Brenda Lee WorkingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Bong KangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API