Legal Opinion

Dike v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1969No. 41399, 41466PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a special verdict in a third-party declaratory judgment action to establish automobile liability insurance coverage and from the trial court’s denial of its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

On September 7, 1962, plaintiff, a wholesale and retail bait dealer, obtained automobile liability insurance on his 1959 pickup truck from the defendant through the Hamilton Insurance Agency in Crosby, Minnesota. The Hamilton Insurance Agency, consisting of Harold Hamilton and his son Earl,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. National Indemnity Co. v. GiampapaWashington Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LaSalle National Insurance v. PophamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Bjork v. Dairyland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Fitch v. ByeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Folk v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API