Fitch v. Bye
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment determining that defendant Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company affords coverage to defendants Bye for damages occurring to plaintiffs Fitch arising out of a two-car automobile collision. Since the Bye vehicle was not described in the Preferred policy, the issue is whether Bye acquired ownership of it as a replacement of the described automobile within the meaning of the Preferred policy.
In July 1963, Bye purchased a 1955 Ford for which he secured liability coverage from Preferred. In November 1963, he purchased a 1957 Plymouth,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boedigheimer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- National Indemnity Co. v. GiampapaWashington Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Corbett v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. NyborgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.