Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Bye

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1970No. 42063PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment determining that defendant Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company affords coverage to defendants Bye for damages occurring to plaintiffs Fitch arising out of a two-car automobile collision. Since the Bye vehicle was not described in the Preferred policy, the issue is whether Bye acquired ownership of it as a replacement of the described automobile within the meaning of the Preferred policy.

In July 1963, Bye purchased a 1955 Ford for which he secured liability coverage from Preferred. In November 1963, he purchased a 1957 Plymouth,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boedigheimer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. National Indemnity Co. v. GiampapaWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Corbett v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. NyborgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Davidson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API