Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1975No. 46941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice:

Presently, the law in Oklahoma is that if an adverse party deposes a party, incompetent to testify under 12 O.S.1971 § 384 [Oklahoma’s Dead Man’s Statute], the adverse party waives the incompetency of the deposed party and the protection afforded by the statute. Dean v. Jelsma, Okl., 316 P.2d 599 (1957), cert. den., 355 U.S. 954, 78 S.Ct. 539, 2 L.Ed.2d 530 (1958), reh. den., 356 U.S. 928, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 759 (1958). Also see Cox v. Gettys, 53 Okl. 58, 156 P. 892 (1916). In the instant case the Court of Appeals followed the above rule of law. On certiorari, appellee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Perry v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Michel v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Westerheide v. ShillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Bordacs v. KimmelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bleakley v. BowlbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Jones, J. v. Plumer, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Oklahoma County Sheriff v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Boswell v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API