Legal Opinion
Bleakley v. Bowlby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1976No. 47844PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Ernest Eugene Bleakley (plaintiff) filed a claim against the Estate of Clyde D. Bowlby, Deceased. Garold M. Bowlby (defendant), the Executor of the Estate, denied the claim and plaintiff commenced this action in the district court. Plaintiff’s claim is based on the alleged oral contract between deceased (Clyde) and his second wife, Edith A. Bowlby relating to the disposition of their property on the death of the survivor. Edith predeceased Clyde. Plaintiff is Edith’s only child by a prior marriage, and defendant is Clyde’s only child by a prior marriage. Plaintiff sought to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Littlefield v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. HoukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Tucker v. ZacharySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Robison v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- J.E. Devine v. Ladd Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Toma v. TomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.