Legal Opinion

Bordacs v. Kimmel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 1962No. 61-362PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 So.2d 506 (1962)

Andy BORDACS, As Executor of the Estate of Gladys Bordacs, Deceased, Appellant,

v.

Carolyn V. KIMMEL, Appellee.

No. 61-362.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 3, 1962.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1962.

Shevin, Goodman & Holtzman and J.H. Kaiser, Miami, for appellant.

Claude Pepper and Albert Harum, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C.J., and HORTON and BARKDULL, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

In this appeal, the appellant-defendant seeks review of a final decree of specific performance and urges many points for consideration.

The primary question to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carolina Lumber Company v. DanielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  2. Embrey v. Southern Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Small v. ShureSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Meola, Et Ux. v. Sparks, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Macknet v. RogersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Mathews v. HinesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
  4. Bechtel v. Estate of BechtelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Briscoe v. FLORIDA NAT. BANK OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API