Legal Opinion

Bonam v. Southern Menhaden Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 16, 1922No. 1505PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALL, District Judge.

Demurrer to the first, second, third, and fourth counts is sustained. The demurrer to the fifth and sixth counts is overruled, and defendant shall plead as it may be advised to the fifth and sixth counts on or before the rule day in June next.

In the above case it seems that upon authority of the adjudicated cases it is clear that the plaintiff was a seaman, and his right to recover must he gauged by the maritime, rather than the common, law. Under the maritime law a seaman injured is entitled to recover his wages, his maintenance and cure; that he is entitled to recover…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Buckley v. Oceanic S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. PremeauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Dawson v. Fernley & EgerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API