Buckley v. Oceanic S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiff in error contends that in suing for two days’ pay for each day’s delay in payment of wages claimed to be due to him as an able seaman (section 4529, Rev, St. [Comp. St. § 8320]) his action is for a penalty, and therefore governed by section 1047, Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1712), which provides that no suit for any penalty accruing under the laws of the United States shall be maintained except where otherwise specially provided, unless the same is commenced within five years from the time when the penalty accrued.
Section 4529 of the Revised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- McGrath v. Panama R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Gerber v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Bonam v. Southern Menhaden Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Loggins v. Steel Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Governor & Co. of the Bank of Scotland v. SabayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- The ChesterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- Alier v. Sea Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.